If you’re running paid ads in 2025, one of the most important decisions is choosing between Google Ads and Microsoft Ads—or learning how to use both strategically to reduce costs and improve performance.
This breakdown explains the differences between the platforms, when to use each one, and how to scale campaigns efficiently without wasting budget.
Google Ads:
Microsoft Ads:
Google is built for scale, while Microsoft is often better for cost efficiency.
Microsoft Ads is most effective when you want to:
However, due to lower traffic volume, scaling may be more limited.
Microsoft Ads also allows direct import of Google campaigns for faster setup.
When importing from Google Ads:
A common benchmark is allocating around 10 percent of your Google Ads budget to Microsoft Ads initially.
Microsoft Ads allows granular device targeting:
This improves budget efficiency and campaign control.
Microsoft Ads offers unique advantages:
These features make Microsoft Ads especially strong for B2B marketers.
Microsoft Ads works well as a testing environment because:
This creates a more efficient overall paid ads strategy.
You should start with Google Ads because it provides higher traffic volume and faster data collection. Microsoft Ads should be used later for expansion and cost optimization.
Yes. Microsoft Ads typically has lower cost per click due to less competition, making it more cost-efficient for certain industries and keywords.
Yes. Microsoft Ads provides an import tool that allows you to transfer Google Ads campaigns, although you still need to adjust tracking, budgets, and optimization settings.
Yes. Microsoft Ads is strong for B2B because of LinkedIn integration, which allows targeting based on job title, industry, and company.
Using both platforms helps you balance scale and cost efficiency. Google Ads provides volume, while Microsoft Ads helps reduce costs and improve ROI through lower competition.
© 2026 Run LLC. All rights reserved.
